Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1901 - 1910 of 3968 for davy.
Search results 1901 - 1910 of 3968 for davy.
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
11-10-2010 Affirmed 2009AP003071 Brian E. Davis v. City of Milwaukee1
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59255 - 2011-01-19
11-10-2010 Affirmed 2009AP003071 Brian E. Davis v. City of Milwaukee1
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59255 - 2011-01-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County: CHAD G. KERKMAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Davis, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294847 - 2020-10-14
County: CHAD G. KERKMAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Davis, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294847 - 2020-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Neubauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108751 - 2017-09-21
for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Neubauer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108751 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶27, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823. Moreover, the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07
.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶27, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823. Moreover, the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07
Bret L. May v. Timothy A. Bonngard
decision by a circuit court as long as the court reasonably exercised its discretion. State v. Davis, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20994 - 2006-01-17
decision by a circuit court as long as the court reasonably exercised its discretion. State v. Davis, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20994 - 2006-01-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
as the gatekeeper to unduly prejudicial evidence. State v. Davis, 2002 WI 75, ¶21, 254
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27439 - 2014-09-15
as the gatekeeper to unduly prejudicial evidence. State v. Davis, 2002 WI 75, ¶21, 254
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27439 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Clause.” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006). Here, the statements at issue were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186149 - 2017-09-21
Clause.” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006). Here, the statements at issue were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186149 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is discretionary. Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶19, 247 Wis. 2d 501, 634 N.W.2d 553. A discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68697 - 2014-09-15
is discretionary. Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶19, 247 Wis. 2d 501, 634 N.W.2d 553. A discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68697 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
disregard for human life. See State v. Davis, 144 Wis. 2d 852, 864, 425 N.W.2d 411 (1988) (concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36847 - 2014-09-15
disregard for human life. See State v. Davis, 144 Wis. 2d 852, 864, 425 N.W.2d 411 (1988) (concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36847 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101011 - 2013-08-20
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101011 - 2013-08-20