Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1901 - 1910 of 29958 for de.

[PDF] State v. Nathaniel A. Lindell
de novo. See Faucher, 227 Wis. 2d at 720, 596 N.W.2d at 779. Nevertheless, the supreme court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16114 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, New Wellness contends that we should review the instant award de novo because we are “more properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682971 - 2023-07-25

[PDF] WI App 68
following a hearing de novo, partially granting her former husband, Bradley Brin’s, request to terminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112238 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc. v. Department of Workforce Development
, this would present a pure question of law and be subject to our de novo review. See Thelen v. DHSS, 143
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2352 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Eduardo Alicea
de novo. See State v. Harris, 199 Wis. 2d 227, 256–263, 544 N.W.2d 545, 557–559 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4907 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
do not remand when the issues raised are otherwise addressed by us de novo. See State v. McDermott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99684 - 2013-07-22

[PDF] Dennis W. Kozich v. Employe Trust Funds Board
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9504 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] AT&T Communications of Wisconsin v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
. AT&T states that “[i]ssues of statutory construction are questions of law and subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18779 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
sheet.” The Commission chose not to address the first issue as it was covered in Windom’s de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31856 - 2014-09-15

2008 WI APP 12
Loth’s motion. This appeal followed.[2] Standard of Review ¶8 We review de novo the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31279 - 2008-01-29