Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1901 - 1910 of 57317 for id.

[PDF] WI APP 138
will review the application of constitutional principles to the facts de novo. Id. ¶6 Officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33728 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Scott Elvers
by the plea agreement. See id., ¶¶46, 48-49. If the defendant’s motion satisfies these requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19978 - 2017-09-21

Ronald J. v. Lisa R.
is not the proper standard to use when determining a custody dispute between a third person and a fit parent. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3271 - 2005-03-31

State v. Yediael Y. Backstrom
resulted in a constitutional violation. Id. ¶10 The parties agree that Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25049 - 2006-06-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
maintenance was stipulated to or contested during the divorce proceedings. Id., ¶2. The objectives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114810 - 2017-09-21

State v. Nathan T. Moore
of the circumstances was not sufficient to create reasonable suspicion to justify a protective search for weapons. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
erroneous standard; then, we review whether those facts meet the constitutional standard de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41714 - 2014-09-15

State v. Scott Elvers
that the circuit court was not bound by the plea agreement. See id., ¶¶46, 48-49. If the defendant’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19978 - 2005-10-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion. Id. “A discretionary decision contemplates a process of reasoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74375 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
made. See id. If it has, we then look to the opposing party’s affidavits to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158226 - 2017-09-21