Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19001 - 19010 of 29721 for des.
Search results 19001 - 19010 of 29721 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105815 - 2017-09-21
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105815 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 220
. Stat. § 807.01 to the facts presented, we employ a de novo standard of review. See Ritt v. Dental Care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26524 - 2006-10-30
. Stat. § 807.01 to the facts presented, we employ a de novo standard of review. See Ritt v. Dental Care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26524 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
reviews de novo. Id., ¶15. ¶4 The double jeopardy provision protects against multiple punishments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41391 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo. Id., ¶15. ¶4 The double jeopardy provision protects against multiple punishments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41391 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
review de novo questions of law involving the application of a statute to a particular set of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26778 - 2006-10-11
review de novo questions of law involving the application of a statute to a particular set of facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26778 - 2006-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877016 - 2024-11-19
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877016 - 2024-11-19
State v. Gregory L. Schroeder
de novo. See id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. Much of Schroeder’s complaint about trial counsel[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13026 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. Much of Schroeder’s complaint about trial counsel[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13026 - 2005-03-31
Modern Materials, Inc. v. Advanced Tooling Specialists, Inc.
. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10136 - 2005-03-31
. We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10136 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a criminal complaint alleges sufficient facts to establish probable cause is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78450 - 2012-02-28
a criminal complaint alleges sufficient facts to establish probable cause is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78450 - 2012-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142991 - 2015-06-10
review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142991 - 2015-06-10
State v. Frank E. Mallett
entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7304 - 2005-03-31
entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7304 - 2005-03-31