Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19011 - 19020 of 58480 for speedy trial.
Search results 19011 - 19020 of 58480 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Nelson
that the pleas were involuntary and his trial counsel was ineffective. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2736 - 2017-09-19
that the pleas were involuntary and his trial counsel was ineffective. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2736 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frederick Spivey, Jr. v. William G. Otto
that material issues of fact exist, we reverse and remand for a new trial. I. BACKGROUND. The Spiveys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8264 - 2017-09-19
that material issues of fact exist, we reverse and remand for a new trial. I. BACKGROUND. The Spiveys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8264 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997116 - 2025-08-20
that he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997116 - 2025-08-20
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Cheryl E.
this attorney represent her. Cheryl entered a denial to the petition’s allegations and requested a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7671 - 2005-03-31
this attorney represent her. Cheryl entered a denial to the petition’s allegations and requested a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7671 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randal H. Kuhnke
revocation, contrary to § 343.44(1), STATS. Kuhnke raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9329 - 2017-09-19
revocation, contrary to § 343.44(1), STATS. Kuhnke raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9329 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
both his trial and appellate counsel. We conclude Roalson’s motion did not contain sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213892 - 2018-06-05
both his trial and appellate counsel. We conclude Roalson’s motion did not contain sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213892 - 2018-06-05
Judith Kay Briggs v. Donald James Briggs
for an additional ten years thereafter, to his former wife, Judith Briggs.[1] He argues that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6150 - 2005-03-31
for an additional ten years thereafter, to his former wife, Judith Briggs.[1] He argues that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6150 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James E. Goodman
and a restitution hearing was ordered. ¶4 The parties provided the trial court with written arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25089 - 2017-09-21
and a restitution hearing was ordered. ¶4 The parties provided the trial court with written arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25089 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assault of his daughter I.L.G.A. The matter proceeded to trial in June 2016. At the outset
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196774 - 2017-09-21
assault of his daughter I.L.G.A. The matter proceeded to trial in June 2016. At the outset
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196774 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Virginia Smith v. Terrance A. Smith
of the trial court’s order denying Virginia Smith’s petition for a finding of contempt against her former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2888 - 2017-09-19
of the trial court’s order denying Virginia Smith’s petition for a finding of contempt against her former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2888 - 2017-09-19