Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19021 - 19030 of 20762 for davids.
Search results 19021 - 19030 of 20762 for davids.
State v. Larry J. Sprosty
consistent with this opinion. ¶48 DAVID T. PROSSER, J., did not participate. ¶49 SHIRLEY S
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17329 - 2005-03-31
consistent with this opinion. ¶48 DAVID T. PROSSER, J., did not participate. ¶49 SHIRLEY S
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17329 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
and cause remanded. ¶1 DAVID T. PROSSER, J. This is a review of a published decision of the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84486 - 2012-07-04
and cause remanded. ¶1 DAVID T. PROSSER, J. This is a review of a published decision of the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84486 - 2012-07-04
2006 WI APP 212
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: david t. flanagan, III, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26600 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: david t. flanagan, III, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26600 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard W. Delaney
argument by Joseph R. Cincotta. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by David J. Becker
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16497 - 2005-03-31
argument by Joseph R. Cincotta. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by David J. Becker
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16497 - 2005-03-31
State v. William A. Schmidt
David Prosser, Jr. and Lolita Schneiders. Amicus curiae brief was filed (in the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16931 - 2005-03-31
David Prosser, Jr. and Lolita Schneiders. Amicus curiae brief was filed (in the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16931 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Opinion/Decision (04-15-2022)
, Madison, and David J. Bradford (pro hac vice) and Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago. There was oral argument
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/21ap1450_opdec.pdf - 2022-04-18
, Madison, and David J. Bradford (pro hac vice) and Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago. There was oral argument
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/21ap1450_opdec.pdf - 2022-04-18
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, Tanner G. Jean-Louis and Boardman & Clark LLP, Madison, and David J. Bradford (pro hac vice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511572 - 2022-06-08
, Tanner G. Jean-Louis and Boardman & Clark LLP, Madison, and David J. Bradford (pro hac vice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511572 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, Tanner G. Jean-Louis and Boardman & Clark LLP, Madison, and David J. Bradford (pro hac vice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512188 - 2022-04-18
, Tanner G. Jean-Louis and Boardman & Clark LLP, Madison, and David J. Bradford (pro hac vice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512188 - 2022-04-18
[PDF]
Frontsheet
: Braylon Seifert, by his Guardian ad litem, Paul J. Scoptur, Kimberly Seifert and David Seifert
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181980 - 2017-09-21
: Braylon Seifert, by his Guardian ad litem, Paul J. Scoptur, Kimberly Seifert and David Seifert
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181980 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
David R. Schanker Clerk of Supreme Court APPEAL from orders of the Circuit Court for Fond du
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51542 - 2010-06-29
David R. Schanker Clerk of Supreme Court APPEAL from orders of the Circuit Court for Fond du
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51542 - 2010-06-29