Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19021 - 19030 of 29721 for des.

[PDF] State v. Chad A. Achterberg
Source of APPEAL COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Dane JUDGE: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16972 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional standard for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739768 - 2023-12-12

State v. Peter A. Moss
.2d 518 (Ct. App. 1988). We review interpretations of statutes de novo. Id. ¶22 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3160 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitutionally sufficient representation is a question of law that we decide de novo. Smith, 207 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88800 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Eugene Hafner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
should be de novo, paying no deference to the commission’s decision, because the case was heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2304 - 2017-09-19

State v. Penny P. Skaife
constitute reasonable suspicion to justify an investigative stop is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14981 - 2005-03-31

Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Renee J. M.
” to extend the dispositional order relating to Ashley. We review the former question de novo, and the latter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3455 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334 Wis. 2d 335
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160976 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Stanley Egerson
). As such, our review is de novo. See id. However, we value and take particular note of the decisions of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12695 - 2017-09-21

State v. Daniel J. Phillips
constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law which the appellate court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4727 - 2005-03-31