Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19021 - 19030 of 29642 for name.
Search results 19021 - 19030 of 29642 for name.
State v. Arthur B. Patton
was registered to “Mrs. Patton.” Torres recognized Patton’s name from a prior traffic citation and a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31
was registered to “Mrs. Patton.” Torres recognized Patton’s name from a prior traffic citation and a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5467 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that other sentencing factors that a circuit court must consider, namely McKenzie’s character and the need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120440 - 2014-08-27
that other sentencing factors that a circuit court must consider, namely McKenzie’s character and the need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120440 - 2014-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
factor—namely, gravity of the offense. As the State notes, having a “small-town perspective” on crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27474 - 2006-12-18
factor—namely, gravity of the offense. As the State notes, having a “small-town perspective” on crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27474 - 2006-12-18
Dorothy Drake v. Burnett County Board of Adjustment
as a nonconforming structure. Drake also argued she had established hardship—namely, erosion—and that the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25313 - 2006-05-30
as a nonconforming structure. Drake also argued she had established hardship—namely, erosion—and that the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25313 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inaccurate information at his sentencing,” namely, “the mistaken assumption by the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70794 - 2014-09-15
inaccurate information at his sentencing,” namely, “the mistaken assumption by the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70794 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the first two elements, namely that (1) there was an interference with Lander’s interest in the private use
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139882 - 2017-09-21
the first two elements, namely that (1) there was an interference with Lander’s interest in the private use
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139882 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
not maintain corporate records and the business was conducted in the name of Stock and SHD. That argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98726 - 2013-07-17
not maintain corporate records and the business was conducted in the name of Stock and SHD. That argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98726 - 2013-07-17
COURT OF APPEALS
that recognizes LIRC’s significant expertise. Holy Name School v. DILHR, 109 Wis. 2d 381, 386, 326 N.W.2d 121 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98714 - 2013-07-01
that recognizes LIRC’s significant expertise. Holy Name School v. DILHR, 109 Wis. 2d 381, 386, 326 N.W.2d 121 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98714 - 2013-07-01
John P. Reddin v. Richard Galster
should name the Division Administrator as the respondent and should be served on the Division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11950 - 2005-03-31
should name the Division Administrator as the respondent and should be served on the Division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11950 - 2005-03-31
Keith E Broadnax v.
. ¶5 In August, 1994, the same client was named defendant in an action by another insurer arising
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17040 - 2005-03-31
. ¶5 In August, 1994, the same client was named defendant in an action by another insurer arising
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17040 - 2005-03-31