Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19031 - 19040 of 91451 for 1.
Search results 19031 - 19040 of 91451 for 1.
CA Blank Order
. W.: Dane County v. Thomas F. W. (L.C. # 2001ME263) Before Kloppenburg, J.[1] Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105606 - 2013-12-10
. W.: Dane County v. Thomas F. W. (L.C. # 2001ME263) Before Kloppenburg, J.[1] Attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105606 - 2013-12-10
[PDF]
City of New London v. James E. Knaus
a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN P. HOFFMANN, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4809 - 2017-09-20
a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN P. HOFFMANN, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4809 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Motion to File Amicus-Non-Party Brief (Congressmen)
2021AP001450 Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Congressmen) Filed 09-07-2021 Page 1 of 8 - 2
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motfileamicusnpbriefcongressmen.pdf - 2021-10-18
2021AP001450 Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (Congressmen) Filed 09-07-2021 Page 1 of 8 - 2
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motfileamicusnpbriefcongressmen.pdf - 2021-10-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm. 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763333 - 2024-02-15
. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm. 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763333 - 2024-02-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e) (2021-22).1 Williams’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816798 - 2024-06-26
. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e) (2021-22).1 Williams’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816798 - 2024-06-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm, based on a complete failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156431 - 2017-09-21
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm, based on a complete failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156431 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2021-22)1 and the parties have consequently submitted memorandum briefs. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682552 - 2023-07-25
(2021-22)1 and the parties have consequently submitted memorandum briefs. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682552 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e) (2021-22).1 Williams’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816798 - 2024-06-26
. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e) (2021-22).1 Williams’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816798 - 2024-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Gundrum, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Gary J. Harrast appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149259 - 2017-09-21
. Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Gundrum, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Gary J. Harrast appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149259 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.02(1) (2023-24) and attempted first- degree intentional homicide contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965423 - 2025-06-05
contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.02(1) (2023-24) and attempted first- degree intentional homicide contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965423 - 2025-06-05

