Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19031 - 19040 of 40005 for financial disclosure statements.

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Petitioners
statement that districts could be noncontiguous to accommodate municipal islands contains no analysis
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030responsebriefpet.pdf - 2023-10-30

[PDF] WI App 35
testify about statements Garcia had made to Ochoa that caused him to return to Garcia’s home when Ochoa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539546 - 2022-10-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not to testify; (4) the jury instructions; and (5) the parties’ opening statements and closing arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16

[PDF] John D. Tiggs, Jr. v. Grant County Circuit Court
and the audibility of the statement made. Id. at 426. The supreme court considered these additional findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6157 - 2017-09-19

State v. Steven D. Cathey
….” His answer of “Yes. I know this” to the court’s statement, “We’re way beyond [having a different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13754 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Synopsis of cases being heard in oral argument, October 2019
issues: 1. Wisconsin Statute Section 100.18(1) only prohibits fraudulent statements made
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsoct2019.pdf - 2019-09-26

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 3 & 14, 2019
prohibits fraudulent statements made “to the public.” “The public” means more than one person
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247728 - 2019-09-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not to testify; (4) the jury instructions; and (5) the parties’ opening statements and closing arguments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050940 - 2025-12-16

[PDF] State v. Steven D. Cathey
this” to the court’s statement, “We’re way beyond [having a different probation officer] now,” does not clear up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13755 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Darlene M. Weyenberg v. University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
not able to make that same statement.” The vice chancellor considered the subcommittee’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10917 - 2017-09-20