Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19061 - 19070 of 29810 for des.
Search results 19061 - 19070 of 29810 for des.
County of Dane v. Larry N. Winsand
de novo. State v. Busch, 217 Wis. 2d 429, 441, 576 N.W.2d 904 (1998). ¶6 Before addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6716 - 2005-03-31
de novo. State v. Busch, 217 Wis. 2d 429, 441, 576 N.W.2d 904 (1998). ¶6 Before addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6716 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Renee J. M.
order relating to Ashley. We review the former question de novo, and the latter for clear error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3455 - 2017-09-19
order relating to Ashley. We review the former question de novo, and the latter for clear error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3455 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a “Decision and Order on Property Division, Maintenance, Child Support, Contempt, and De Novo Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133440 - 2017-09-21
a “Decision and Order on Property Division, Maintenance, Child Support, Contempt, and De Novo Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133440 - 2017-09-21
City of Sheboygan v. Andrew M. Wilson
). Whether a claim has arguable merit is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2308 - 2005-03-31
). Whether a claim has arguable merit is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2308 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey P. Powers
erroneous. Id. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6879 - 2017-09-20
erroneous. Id. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo. Id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6879 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Jane Barry v. Maple Bluff Country Club, Inc.
, or the application of a statute to undisputed facts, which we decide de novo. Id. at 233, 568 N.W.2d at 34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2558 - 2017-09-19
, or the application of a statute to undisputed facts, which we decide de novo. Id. at 233, 568 N.W.2d at 34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2558 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Michelle Ennis v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company
terms under a de novo standard, without deference to the decision of the circuit court. Kaun v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13900 - 2014-09-15
terms under a de novo standard, without deference to the decision of the circuit court. Kaun v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13900 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dorothy E. Paulman Executor: Carole D. Paulman v. Jeannine Pemberton
review de novo. See Rumage v. Gullberg, 2000 WI 53, ¶16, 235 Wis. 2d 279, 611 N.W.2d 458
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14668 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See Rumage v. Gullberg, 2000 WI 53, ¶16, 235 Wis. 2d 279, 611 N.W.2d 458
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14668 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglass Potter
that we review de novo. State v. Peters, 2003 WI 88, ¶13, 263 Wis. 2d 475, 665 N.W.2d 171. We interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6662 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. State v. Peters, 2003 WI 88, ¶13, 263 Wis. 2d 475, 665 N.W.2d 171. We interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6662 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Edward Lee Hennings
. Foster, 191 Wis.2d 14, 23, 528 N.W.2d 22, 26 (Ct. App. 1995). Our review on this issue is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12590 - 2017-09-21
. Foster, 191 Wis.2d 14, 23, 528 N.W.2d 22, 26 (Ct. App. 1995). Our review on this issue is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12590 - 2017-09-21