Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19061 - 19070 of 41921 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 19061 - 19070 of 41921 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree recklessly endangering safety while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121176 - 2014-09-15
the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree recklessly endangering safety while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., appeals his judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of strangulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982148 - 2025-07-15
., appeals his judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of strangulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982148 - 2025-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
reasons. We reject Dunlap’s argument, and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Dunlap proceeded to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122799 - 2014-09-29
reasons. We reject Dunlap’s argument, and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Dunlap proceeded to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122799 - 2014-09-29
[PDF]
Pierce County v. Billie Jo S.
remanded. CANE, C.J. Following a jury trial, Billie Jo S. appeals the original and amended orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14563 - 2017-09-21
remanded. CANE, C.J. Following a jury trial, Billie Jo S. appeals the original and amended orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14563 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient reasons. We reject Dunlap’s argument, and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Dunlap proceeded to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122799 - 2014-09-30
sufficient reasons. We reject Dunlap’s argument, and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Dunlap proceeded to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122799 - 2014-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2016, a jury found Tucker guilty of one count of first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596782 - 2022-12-06
. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2016, a jury found Tucker guilty of one count of first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596782 - 2022-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
and Reilly, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Randall S. Werdin appeals from a judgment, entered upon a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64079 - 2011-05-17
and Reilly, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Randall S. Werdin appeals from a judgment, entered upon a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64079 - 2011-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
at an average rate of .015 per hour. ¶11 The jury convicted Luedtke on all three counts, concluding Luedtke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91612 - 2013-01-14
at an average rate of .015 per hour. ¶11 The jury convicted Luedtke on all three counts, concluding Luedtke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91612 - 2013-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment, entered upon a jury verdict, convicting him of forty-two1 counts of possession of child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64079 - 2014-09-15
a judgment, entered upon a jury verdict, convicting him of forty-two1 counts of possession of child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64079 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in possession of a firearm. Towns argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient for the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072093 - 2026-02-03
in possession of a firearm. Towns argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient for the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072093 - 2026-02-03