Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19071 - 19080 of 30175 for de.
Search results 19071 - 19080 of 30175 for de.
[PDF]
James R. Schofield v. Raymond E. Smith
of Review. ¶8 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5526 - 2017-09-19
of Review. ¶8 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5526 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Lee, 2008 WI App 185, ¶7, 314 Wis. 2d 764
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199868 - 2017-11-01
presents a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Lee, 2008 WI App 185, ¶7, 314 Wis. 2d 764
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199868 - 2017-11-01
[PDF]
WI APP 267
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶13 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30755 - 2014-09-15
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶13 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30755 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous; however, we review the trial court’s application of constitutional principles to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272877 - 2020-07-28
erroneous; however, we review the trial court’s application of constitutional principles to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272877 - 2020-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766813 - 2024-02-21
a circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766813 - 2024-02-21
[PDF]
WI App 71
for the stipulated amount. West Bend now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶19 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882062 - 2025-01-24
for the stipulated amount. West Bend now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶19 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882062 - 2025-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This Court “review[s] a grant of summary judgment de novo.” Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46, 372
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001596 - 2025-08-27
This Court “review[s] a grant of summary judgment de novo.” Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46, 372
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001596 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
the disposition of a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology the circuit courts apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962750 - 2025-05-30
the disposition of a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology the circuit courts apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962750 - 2025-05-30
Wendy Pero v. Donald Lucas
established a substantial change in circumstances is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id., ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25088 - 2006-06-27
established a substantial change in circumstances is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id., ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25088 - 2006-06-27
State v. Lucian Agnello
to historical facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kieffer, 217 Wis. 2d at 541. The State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3068 - 2005-03-31
to historical facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kieffer, 217 Wis. 2d at 541. The State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3068 - 2005-03-31