Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19081 - 19090 of 83454 for case code.
Search results 19081 - 19090 of 83454 for case code.
State v. Rayshun D. Eason
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2595-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14468 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2595-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14468 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rayshun D. Eason
2000 WI App 73 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2595
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14468 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI App 73 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2595
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14468 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Duerst
preclusion in the particular case. Paige K. B., 226 Wis. 2d at 224-225. No. 04-1046-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7467 - 2017-09-20
preclusion in the particular case. Paige K. B., 226 Wis. 2d at 224-225. No. 04-1046-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7467 - 2017-09-20
State v. Todd D. Duerst
step of the inquiry, whether it is fundamentally fair to apply issue preclusion in the particular case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7467 - 2005-03-31
step of the inquiry, whether it is fundamentally fair to apply issue preclusion in the particular case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7467 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded that she had made a prima facie case for plea withdrawal and directed the postdisposition court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
concluded that she had made a prima facie case for plea withdrawal and directed the postdisposition court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
Michael F. Mullen v. Cedar River Lumber Company
2001 WI App 142 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3284 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 142 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3284 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael V. Hendricks
court’s failure to decide his motion to reopen his operating while intoxicated case. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5209 - 2005-03-31
court’s failure to decide his motion to reopen his operating while intoxicated case. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5209 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael V. Hendricks
court’s failure to decide his motion to reopen his operating while intoxicated case. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5208 - 2005-03-31
court’s failure to decide his motion to reopen his operating while intoxicated case. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5208 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gerald D. Schrank
discretion to grant a new trial in the interest of justice “only in exceptional cases.” State v. Cuyler, 110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7001 - 2005-03-31
discretion to grant a new trial in the interest of justice “only in exceptional cases.” State v. Cuyler, 110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7001 - 2005-03-31
Village of Oregon v. Robyn R. Sunday
disagree and affirm. Background ¶2 This case concerns Sunday’s arrest on September 6, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5899 - 2005-03-31
disagree and affirm. Background ¶2 This case concerns Sunday’s arrest on September 6, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5899 - 2005-03-31