Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19081 - 19090 of 28805 for f.
Search results 19081 - 19090 of 28805 for f.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that “[i]f a judgment for a fine or costs or both is entered in a prosecution in which a [bail
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878176 - 2024-11-19
that “[i]f a judgment for a fine or costs or both is entered in a prosecution in which a [bail
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878176 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he describes as a “[f]orensic analysis” indicating an “unlikeliness” that Cooper’s voice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180869 - 2017-09-21
that he describes as a “[f]orensic analysis” indicating an “unlikeliness” that Cooper’s voice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s assistance was constitutionally ineffective: [f]irst, that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410210 - 2021-08-17
counsel’s assistance was constitutionally ineffective: [f]irst, that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410210 - 2021-08-17
City of Manitowoc v. Michael L. McKenna
a jury, “[f]indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2695 - 2005-03-31
a jury, “[f]indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2695 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007-08). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2007-08 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55391 - 2010-10-12
. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007-08). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2007-08 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55391 - 2010-10-12
State v. Michael J. Jordan
] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f), (3) (2001-02). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6508 - 2005-03-31
] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f), (3) (2001-02). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6508 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven E. Mariades v. Marquette County
provides an exception to the general grant of immunity found in § 893.80(4).” In other words: [I]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13354 - 2017-09-21
provides an exception to the general grant of immunity found in § 893.80(4).” In other words: [I]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13354 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Heidi L. Williams
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999- 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4120 - 2017-09-20
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999- 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4120 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Eric S. Fenz
: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Affirmed. Before Roggensack, Deininger and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4013 - 2017-09-20
: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Affirmed. Before Roggensack, Deininger and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4013 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix County: EDWARD F. VLACK III, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HRUZ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259260 - 2020-05-05
a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix County: EDWARD F. VLACK III, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HRUZ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259260 - 2020-05-05