Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19091 - 19100 of 68502 for did.
Search results 19091 - 19100 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or stealing of the purse, and, as a result, the State did not charge Mitchell with that crime. In October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730129 - 2023-11-22
or stealing of the purse, and, as a result, the State did not charge Mitchell with that crime. In October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730129 - 2023-11-22
State v. Virginia R. Ray
entered onto the Dombecks’ property. Ray raises the following issues on appeal: (1) Did the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5723 - 2005-03-31
entered onto the Dombecks’ property. Ray raises the following issues on appeal: (1) Did the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy M. Secrist
decision to arrest Secrist. The officer did not see any smoke in the vehicle nor did he make any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12944 - 2017-09-21
decision to arrest Secrist. The officer did not see any smoke in the vehicle nor did he make any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12944 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Yelk
. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and RULE 809.32(1), STATS. Yelk did not respond. After an independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11850 - 2017-09-21
. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and RULE 809.32(1), STATS. Yelk did not respond. After an independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11850 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Bohannon who averred that, contrary to his trial testimony, the victim did possess a gun during
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908197 - 2025-02-05
Bohannon who averred that, contrary to his trial testimony, the victim did possess a gun during
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908197 - 2025-02-05
State v. Ventae Parrow
hearing. The judgments and order are affirmed because the allegations against the trial attorney did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
hearing. The judgments and order are affirmed because the allegations against the trial attorney did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14987 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not see the ladder get knocked out from underneath him. After his fall, he asked Erdmann what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71752 - 2011-10-03
did not see the ladder get knocked out from underneath him. After his fall, he asked Erdmann what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71752 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing that the Waukesha felony (strangulation and suffocation) was dismissed because Ms. H. did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102980 - 2017-09-21
hearing that the Waukesha felony (strangulation and suffocation) was dismissed because Ms. H. did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102980 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward J. Heuer
: “Is that sentence consecutive to what he’s currently serving?” Defense counsel did not object to the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7275 - 2005-03-31
: “Is that sentence consecutive to what he’s currently serving?” Defense counsel did not object to the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7275 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
happened, but she did not appear to be thinking about her answers. McNamara said that when Lewallen came
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30142 - 2007-09-04
happened, but she did not appear to be thinking about her answers. McNamara said that when Lewallen came
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30142 - 2007-09-04