Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1911 - 1920 of 62323 for child support.
Search results 1911 - 1920 of 62323 for child support.
Dana M. LeDuc v. Patrick J. Hayes
he didn’t pay enough child support,” although he pays $1,475 per month. The court also noted Dana’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6909 - 2005-03-31
he didn’t pay enough child support,” although he pays $1,475 per month. The court also noted Dana’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6909 - 2005-03-31
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Rodney W.
for or interest in the support, care or well-being of the child, whether the person has neglected or refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18488 - 2005-06-08
for or interest in the support, care or well-being of the child, whether the person has neglected or refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18488 - 2005-06-08
Tammie J. C. v. Robert T. R.
, custody and control of the parties’ minor child, THOMAS …, born September 28, 1988, and Petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4498 - 2005-03-31
, custody and control of the parties’ minor child, THOMAS …, born September 28, 1988, and Petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4498 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in circumstances warrants a modification to the child support order. On the latter topic, we remand for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243442 - 2019-07-11
in circumstances warrants a modification to the child support order. On the latter topic, we remand for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243442 - 2019-07-11
Kathy Jo Strittmater v. Dale P. Strittmater
in ordering Kramer to pay twenty-five percent of her gross income as child support to Strittmater. We resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13545 - 2005-03-31
in ordering Kramer to pay twenty-five percent of her gross income as child support to Strittmater. We resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13545 - 2005-03-31
John H. Heide v. Francis M.
IN RE THE INTEREST OF ASHLEY W., A CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 18: JOHN H. HEIDE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10167 - 2005-03-31
IN RE THE INTEREST OF ASHLEY W., A CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 18: JOHN H. HEIDE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10167 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John H. Heide v. Francis M.
IN RE THE INTEREST OF ASHLEY W., A CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 18: JOHN H. HEIDE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10167 - 2017-09-19
IN RE THE INTEREST OF ASHLEY W., A CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 18: JOHN H. HEIDE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10167 - 2017-09-19
State v. Julio G.
placing her with the Milwaukee County Bureau of Child Welfare and, on January 23, 1996, Glamaris was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5280 - 2005-03-31
placing her with the Milwaukee County Bureau of Child Welfare and, on January 23, 1996, Glamaris was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Julio G.
signed a voluntary placement agreement placing her with the Milwaukee County Bureau of Child Welfare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5280 - 2017-09-19
signed a voluntary placement agreement placing her with the Milwaukee County Bureau of Child Welfare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5280 - 2017-09-19
Roger D. H. v. Virginia O.
concerning the best interest of her child and, “absent a finding that [she] is an unfit parent,” the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3368 - 2005-03-31
concerning the best interest of her child and, “absent a finding that [she] is an unfit parent,” the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3368 - 2005-03-31