Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1911 - 1920 of 74839 for judgment for us.

Alice Vogel v. Town of Farmington
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County: PHILIP M. KIRK, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7940 - 2005-03-31

Petersen Supply, LLC v. Wisconsin Gas Company
a judgment of the circuit court for Ozaukee County: thomas r. wolfgram, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3601 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
nonconforming use. Grand Videre also asserts that the Town Board’s rezoning of the Gehrigs’s property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29516 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the property was to “legalize” the Gehrigs’s nonconforming use. Grand Videre also asserts that the Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29516 - 2007-06-27

[PDF] David Kosmo v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: GREGORY A. PETERSON, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11352 - 2017-09-19

David Kosmo v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: GREGORY A. PETERSON, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11352 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Randall McConochie
judgment. McConochie moved the misdemeanor court to strike the use of the Dodge county default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2371 - 2017-09-19

State v. Randall McConochie
the misdemeanor court to strike the use of the Dodge county default judgment for enhancement purposes because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2371 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] St. Croix County v. John Bettendorf
a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix County: SCOTT R. NEEDHAM, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15724 - 2017-09-21

St. Croix County v. John Bettendorf
was not lawful, he obtained no vested right to continue that unlawful use. By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15724 - 2005-03-31