Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1911 - 1920 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 1911 - 1920 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new sentencing hearing because the trial court failed to adequately explain the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98285 - 2014-09-15
to a new sentencing hearing because the trial court failed to adequately explain the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98285 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ventae Parrow
and that the trial court erred when it refused to hold an evidentiary hearing. The judgments and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14988 - 2017-09-21
and that the trial court erred when it refused to hold an evidentiary hearing. The judgments and order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14988 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bobby G. Grant
in violation of § 943.13, STATS., all as a habitual offender. He also appeals from the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14340 - 2014-09-15
in violation of § 943.13, STATS., all as a habitual offender. He also appeals from the trial court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14340 - 2014-09-15
State v. Bobby G. Grant
to a dwelling in violation of § 943.13, Stats., all as a habitual offender. He also appeals from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14340 - 2005-03-31
to a dwelling in violation of § 943.13, Stats., all as a habitual offender. He also appeals from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14340 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Daniel A. Dietrich v. Jeanne A. Dietrich
a divorce judgment. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5679 - 2017-09-19
a divorce judgment. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5679 - 2017-09-19
Ellen M. Gleason v. Richard J. Gleason
to the property division in a divorce proceeding. Gleason claims the trial court’s calculations were erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5162 - 2005-03-31
to the property division in a divorce proceeding. Gleason claims the trial court’s calculations were erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5162 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and from an order denying his postconviction motion. Clark seeks resentencing on grounds that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142699 - 2017-09-21
and from an order denying his postconviction motion. Clark seeks resentencing on grounds that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142699 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39573 - 2014-09-15
argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39573 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39573 - 2009-08-27
argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39573 - 2009-08-27
State v. William Speener
an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Speener
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12022 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Speener
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12022 - 2005-03-31