Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1911 - 1920 of 6401 for wide.
Search results 1911 - 1920 of 6401 for wide.
[PDF]
NOTICE
outside “the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55693 - 2014-09-15
outside “the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55693 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2006AP2819 4 to specific acts or omissions of the lawyer that are “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29136 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2006AP2819 4 to specific acts or omissions of the lawyer that are “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29136 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jacob J. Droessler
a wide variety of legitimate law enforcement practices.” Id. at 554
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14313 - 2005-03-31
a wide variety of legitimate law enforcement practices.” Id. at 554
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14313 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a wide range of factors, keeping in mind the competing interests of finality and fairness. Id., ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91764 - 2013-01-22
a wide range of factors, keeping in mind the competing interests of finality and fairness. Id., ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91764 - 2013-01-22
State v. Andre M. Pirtle
conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Strickland v. Washington, 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9496 - 2005-03-31
conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Strickland v. Washington, 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9496 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John L. Williams
of the relevant factors is particularly within the wide discretion of the trial court. See Curbello-Rodriguez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11348 - 2017-09-19
of the relevant factors is particularly within the wide discretion of the trial court. See Curbello-Rodriguez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11348 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a defendant must identify specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135724 - 2017-09-21
, a defendant must identify specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135724 - 2017-09-21
Gary G. Baumann v. Brian Saari
and was approximately twelve feet wide. ¶5 The court also noted that the Saaris’ witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25774 - 2006-07-04
and was approximately twelve feet wide. ¶5 The court also noted that the Saaris’ witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25774 - 2006-07-04
Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee v. Jacqualin King
a right-to-remedy second chance. We agree. II. ¶11 Trial courts have wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7513 - 2005-03-31
a right-to-remedy second chance. We agree. II. ¶11 Trial courts have wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7513 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to set forth in his motion specific acts or omission by his trial counsel that fall “outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73239 - 2014-09-15
to set forth in his motion specific acts or omission by his trial counsel that fall “outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73239 - 2014-09-15