Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1911 - 1920 of 49866 for writ of certiorari forms.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence of the date on which he or she deposited the petition [for certiorari review of a prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125425 - 2017-09-21

Lori A. Johnson v. City of Waukesha
, but the decision was made not to renew her license. ¶6 Johnson sought certiorari review of the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3667 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lori A. Johnson v. City of Waukesha
was made not to renew her license. No. 01-0577 3 ¶6 Johnson sought certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3667 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Barry L. Ball v. Matthew Frank
from an order dismissing his action for statutory certiorari review of a prison disciplinary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21513 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Court of Appeals Statistics January 2025
issued in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913925 - 2025-02-10

[PDF] Court of Appeals Statistics January 2025
issued in the form of a court order after the court has reviewed the briefs and the record
/ca/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913925 - 2025-02-10

[PDF] Community Development Authority of the City of Glendale v. Hancock Fabrics, Inc.
”) appeals from a trial court order granting the application for a writ of assistance sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18716 - 2017-09-21

Community Development Authority of the City of Glendale v. Hancock Fabrics, Inc.
, Inc. (“Hancock”) appeals from a trial court order granting the application for a writ of assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18716 - 2005-06-27

[PDF]
certiorari petitions that sought circuit court review of multiple Department of Corrections decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749763 - 2024-01-11

[PDF] NOTICE
pleading was a writ of coram nobis, his newly-filed § 974.06 motion is not subject to the Escalona bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31116 - 2014-09-15