Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19101 - 19110 of 29721 for des.
Search results 19101 - 19110 of 29721 for des.
[PDF]
State v. William H. Roberts
convictions. Both issues present questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Liebnitz, 231 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4089 - 2017-09-20
convictions. Both issues present questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Liebnitz, 231 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4089 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106, 571 N.W.2d 417 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837457 - 2024-08-14
of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106, 571 N.W.2d 417 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837457 - 2024-08-14
[PDF]
Roland F. Sarko v. Examining Board of Architects
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3892 - 2017-09-20
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3892 - 2017-09-20
State v. Everton Taylor
. Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d 672, 682, 482 N.W.2d 364 (1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
. Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d 672, 682, 482 N.W.2d 364 (1992), and we determine de novo whether the facts satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John Doe 67A v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee
appeal is whether the “discovery rule” applies. The trial court held that it did not. On our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6526 - 2017-09-19
appeal is whether the “discovery rule” applies. The trial court held that it did not. On our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6526 - 2017-09-19
Laurel Banovez v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2722 - 2005-03-31
judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2722 - 2005-03-31
Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
review de novo, while other factors are matters for the exercise of discretion by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14502 - 2005-03-31
review de novo, while other factors are matters for the exercise of discretion by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14502 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 42
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28751 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28751 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the application of a particular statute is a question of law that we review de novo. J.R., 390 Wis. 2d 326, ¶51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260564 - 2020-05-13
to the application of a particular statute is a question of law that we review de novo. J.R., 390 Wis. 2d 326, ¶51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260564 - 2020-05-13
James H. Cameron v. Jane P. Cameron
interpretation of ch. 767, Stats., which is a question of law we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8588 - 2005-03-31
interpretation of ch. 767, Stats., which is a question of law we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8588 - 2005-03-31