Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19111 - 19120 of 92044 for 1.
Search results 19111 - 19120 of 92044 for 1.
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94809 - 2013-04-02
a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94809 - 2013-04-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Krzysztof Lagiewka appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72523 - 2014-09-15
. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Krzysztof Lagiewka appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72523 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
: David C. Resheske, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51337 - 2010-06-29
: David C. Resheske, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51337 - 2010-06-29
State v. Gary R. Malkmus
JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] Gary Malkmus appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26332 - 2006-09-05
JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 CANE, C.J.[1] Gary Malkmus appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26332 - 2006-09-05
[PDF]
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett
of newly discovered evidence. Lockett makes three arguments: (1) the new evidence required the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7951 - 2017-09-19
of newly discovered evidence. Lockett makes three arguments: (1) the new evidence required the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7951 - 2017-09-19
State v. Walter J. Griffin
County: Steven D. Ebert, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
County: Steven D. Ebert, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
State v. Devaldis A. Garth
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3028 - 2005-03-31
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3028 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kristen Marsh
was ineffective for failing to present that argument.1 We reject these arguments and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14700 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective for failing to present that argument.1 We reject these arguments and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14700 - 2017-09-21
David E. Meiers v. Frederick W. Bennett
on the undisputed portion of the commission.[1] The trial court ruled that an amended contract was invalid under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12112 - 2005-03-31
on the undisputed portion of the commission.[1] The trial court ruled that an amended contract was invalid under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12112 - 2005-03-31
David S. Frederick v. Columbia Correctional Institution
. Accordingly, we affirm.[1] BACKGROUND In 1987, Frederick was convicted of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8966 - 2005-03-31
. Accordingly, we affirm.[1] BACKGROUND In 1987, Frederick was convicted of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8966 - 2005-03-31