Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19111 - 19120 of 59372 for quit claim deed.
Search results 19111 - 19120 of 59372 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the claims are procedurally barred absent a sufficient reason for failing to raise them previously. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39487 - 2014-09-15
that the claims are procedurally barred absent a sufficient reason for failing to raise them previously. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39487 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Peter N. Pappas v. John R. Huxhold
on the entire property. At the outset, we address Huxhold's claim that the question of whether an agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9437 - 2017-09-19
on the entire property. At the outset, we address Huxhold's claim that the question of whether an agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9437 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Paul Taylor
the cage door, while Patterson claimed that he had a gun. Summerville positively identified Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11546 - 2017-09-19
the cage door, while Patterson claimed that he had a gun. Summerville positively identified Taylor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11546 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. White claims that the trial court relied on inaccurate information (the prosecutor’s version of how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28891 - 2014-09-15
. White claims that the trial court relied on inaccurate information (the prosecutor’s version of how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28891 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Watton’s claims against the housing authority. This appeal follows. Discussion ¶4 Watton does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118079 - 2014-07-28
Watton’s claims against the housing authority. This appeal follows. Discussion ¶4 Watton does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118079 - 2014-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
751, 728 N.W.2d 686,[1] we hold that a circuit court order expressly dismissing the claims of Ecker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32424 - 2008-05-27
751, 728 N.W.2d 686,[1] we hold that a circuit court order expressly dismissing the claims of Ecker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32424 - 2008-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
claim is that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call four witnesses to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49839 - 2010-05-10
claim is that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call four witnesses to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49839 - 2010-05-10
COURT OF APPEALS
raised in a previous motion or appeal, we hold that the claims are procedurally barred absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39487 - 2009-08-17
raised in a previous motion or appeal, we hold that the claims are procedurally barred absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39487 - 2009-08-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
4 ¶10 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant bears the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104346 - 2017-09-21
4 ¶10 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant bears the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104346 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the plea colloquy. As relevant to this appeal, 2 Mursal claimed that while the circuit court informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155843 - 2017-09-21
in the plea colloquy. As relevant to this appeal, 2 Mursal claimed that while the circuit court informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155843 - 2017-09-21