Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19121 - 19130 of 29722 for des.
Search results 19121 - 19130 of 29722 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Albert
with Skwierawski were essentially of de minimis significance. But, as noted earlier, neither we nor the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4075 - 2017-09-20
with Skwierawski were essentially of de minimis significance. But, as noted earlier, neither we nor the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4075 - 2017-09-20
David Kosmo v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
judgment de novo by applying the standards in § 802.08, Stats., in the same manner as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11352 - 2005-03-31
judgment de novo by applying the standards in § 802.08, Stats., in the same manner as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11352 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶33. For the same reasons we have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206462 - 2018-01-03
review de novo. See Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶33. For the same reasons we have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206462 - 2018-01-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145914 - 2017-09-21
prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145914 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of a divorce judgment is a legal issue subject to a de novo standard of review. Waters v. Waters, 2007 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132031 - 2014-12-22
of a divorce judgment is a legal issue subject to a de novo standard of review. Waters v. Waters, 2007 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132031 - 2014-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116172 - 2014-07-02
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116172 - 2014-07-02
[PDF]
State v. Michael Marks
to de novo review. State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89, ¶14, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 681 N.W.2d 871
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6725 - 2017-09-20
to de novo review. State v. Henning, 2004 WI 89, ¶14, ___ Wis. 2d ___, 681 N.W.2d 871
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6725 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Cynthia M.
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19041 - 2017-09-21
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19041 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. A. Deficient Performance ¶13 Seever argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176947 - 2017-09-21
determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. A. Deficient Performance ¶13 Seever argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Keith M. Carey
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6583 - 2017-09-19
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6583 - 2017-09-19