Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19121 - 19130 of 34575 for in n.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
issues raised for the first time in a reply brief. State v. Grade, 165 Wis. 2d 143, 151 n.2, 477 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295054 - 2020-10-14

COURT OF APPEALS
, n.4, 749 N.W.2d 913.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34559 - 2008-11-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Parker Mathers 930 N. York Rd., #200 Hinsdale, IL 60521-2913 Criminal Appeals Unit Department
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341049 - 2021-03-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
., State v. Cummings, 199 Wis. 2d 721, 747 n.10, 546 N.W.2d 406 (1996) (stating that counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247885 - 2019-09-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
this issue for appeal. See Fuller v. Riedel, 159 Wis. 2d 323, 330 n.3, 464 N.W.2d 97 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609028 - 2023-01-10

COURT OF APPEALS
intentional homicide, were dismissed as read-ins at sentencing. ¶3 Powell’s first appellate issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07

[PDF] NOTICE
main brief may not do so in its reply brief. State v. Marquardt, 2001 WI App 219, ¶14 n.3, 247 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40653 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. 4 At sentencing, the circuit court judge remarked, “[I]n my 27 years on the bench this may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165187 - 2017-09-21

State v. Lester H. Cook
responded, "[n]o." There is no specific explanation in his motion as to why he did not understand that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10222 - 2005-03-31

State v. Peter J. Davies
. § 343.305 used to be “reasonableness.” State v. Carlson, 2002 WI App 44, ¶1 n.1, 250 Wis. 2d 562, 641 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5475 - 2005-03-31