Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19121 - 19130 of 58267 for speedy trial.

State v. Demetrius A. Green
).[1] Green argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in refusing to allow him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5210 - 2005-03-31

97-06 ORDERED effective January 1, 2000, SCR 20:3.6(a),(c),(c)(1),(c)3),(c)(7) are amended; 20:3.6(d)and (e) are created, and the Comment to 20:3.6 is amended. FURTHER ORDERED proposed amendment of SCR 20:3.8, is denied.
Court Madison, WI In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR 20:3.6 -- Trial Publicity
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=999 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
, judgment and sentence to permit withdrawal of his guilty plea. The trial court denied Urbschat’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94675 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kristina Magnuson
at the time of the alleged assault. ¶3 Before trial and in her postconviction motion, Magnuson moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17725 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and that his trial counsel was ineffective. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131229 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
trial, Schmitt advised the court that Lewis withdrew because she worked only with represented parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98292 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
] postconviction motion without a hearing. Buss argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29358 - 2007-06-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-degree recklessly endangering safety as a repeater. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77320 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
] We affirm. In 2005, Hodgkins pled guilty to one count of burglary and the trial court withheld
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122247 - 2014-09-23

Karl A. Anderson v. Carl G. Hedlund
, the soil clean up in the spring." The trial court concluded that the parties' contract was unambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14287 - 2005-03-31