Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19131 - 19140 of 98453 for court records search online.
Search results 19131 - 19140 of 98453 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
court erroneously exercised its discretion because the record shows that the court did not consider any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92907 - 2013-02-18
court erroneously exercised its discretion because the record shows that the court did not consider any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92907 - 2013-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
court set forth its reasoning, based upon facts in the record and the appropriate legal principles. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31613 - 2008-01-28
court set forth its reasoning, based upon facts in the record and the appropriate legal principles. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31613 - 2008-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision is not evidence or part of the DNR record. Judicial review of an administrative agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105813 - 2013-12-18
court’s decision is not evidence or part of the DNR record. Judicial review of an administrative agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105813 - 2013-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
they had not been recorded; and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52407 - 2010-07-26
they had not been recorded; and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing money
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52407 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
discretionary decisions if the court applied the correct legal standard to the facts of record in a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102719 - 2013-10-07
discretionary decisions if the court applied the correct legal standard to the facts of record in a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102719 - 2013-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 17, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29101 - 2007-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 17, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29101 - 2007-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 18, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102022 - 2013-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 18, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102022 - 2013-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75793 - 2011-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75793 - 2011-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
was recorded first and, therefore, it took priority over Citimortgage’s lien. The circuit court, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68886 - 2011-08-02
was recorded first and, therefore, it took priority over Citimortgage’s lien. The circuit court, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68886 - 2011-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction was not supported by credible evidence. We review the record to determine whether the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30813 - 2007-11-07
conviction was not supported by credible evidence. We review the record to determine whether the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30813 - 2007-11-07