Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19141 - 19150 of 39831 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 19141 - 19150 of 39831 for financial disclosure statements.
State v. John E. Prochaska
“For what?” response to Deputy Pierce’s statement that he was going to be charged with causing injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14217 - 2005-03-31
“For what?” response to Deputy Pierce’s statement that he was going to be charged with causing injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14217 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State relies on this statement in Plude: “‘It may well be that newly discovered evidence impeaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161755 - 2017-09-21
the State relies on this statement in Plude: “‘It may well be that newly discovered evidence impeaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161755 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher Townsend
. In the course of her statement, Townsend’s lawyer said: As I mentioned earlier, Mr. Townsend has been revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2168 - 2005-03-31
. In the course of her statement, Townsend’s lawyer said: As I mentioned earlier, Mr. Townsend has been revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffery Rittenhouse
-for-word from start to finish" to Rittenhouse, and Rittenhouse did not contest this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2573 - 2017-09-19
-for-word from start to finish" to Rittenhouse, and Rittenhouse did not contest this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2573 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
disagree. The court’s statement was an accurate statement of law, correctly advising the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93609 - 2013-03-06
disagree. The court’s statement was an accurate statement of law, correctly advising the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93609 - 2013-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there was any basis to challenge the admissibility of Moreno-Richey’s statement to police; (7) counsel failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81294 - 2014-09-15
there was any basis to challenge the admissibility of Moreno-Richey’s statement to police; (7) counsel failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81294 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lawrence J. Gaston
relying solely on the statement of [the victim]? A. Yes – and I believe that statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16284 - 2005-03-31
relying solely on the statement of [the victim]? A. Yes – and I believe that statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16284 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffery Rittenhouse
, and Rittenhouse did not contest this statement. Rittenhouse also declined the court’s express invitation to read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2573 - 2005-03-31
, and Rittenhouse did not contest this statement. Rittenhouse also declined the court’s express invitation to read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2573 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with a “statement of negotiated plea.” That document clearly states that the State may recommend jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44480 - 2009-12-09
with a “statement of negotiated plea.” That document clearly states that the State may recommend jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44480 - 2009-12-09
[PDF]
State v. Darnial C. Craig
conclude that the objection was preserved. ¶4 During the State’s opening statement, the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2860 - 2017-09-19
conclude that the objection was preserved. ¶4 During the State’s opening statement, the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2860 - 2017-09-19