Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19151 - 19160 of 38468 for t's.
Search results 19151 - 19160 of 38468 for t's.
[PDF]
2025AP002121 - 2025-12-03 Court Order
(Electronic Notice) R. Timothy Muth (Electronic Notice) Andrew T. Phillips (Electronic Notice) Michael J
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/25ap2121_1203order.pdf - 2025-12-03
(Electronic Notice) R. Timothy Muth (Electronic Notice) Andrew T. Phillips (Electronic Notice) Michael J
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/25ap2121_1203order.pdf - 2025-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
To: Hon. Michael T. Judge Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Trisha LeFebre Clerk of Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705857 - 2023-09-26
To: Hon. Michael T. Judge Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Trisha LeFebre Clerk of Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705857 - 2023-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Services Charmian Klyve 635 North 26th Street Milwaukee, WI 53233-1803 T. P.-L. Courtney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923101 - 2025-03-11
Services Charmian Klyve 635 North 26th Street Milwaukee, WI 53233-1803 T. P.-L. Courtney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923101 - 2025-03-11
State v. Alice Faye Howard
, ‘[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13286 - 2005-03-31
, ‘[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13286 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
expenses” and dismissing the contempt motion without a hearing. The clarifying order explained: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111794 - 2014-05-07
expenses” and dismissing the contempt motion without a hearing. The clarifying order explained: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111794 - 2014-05-07
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Lindsey
exercised its discretion in sentencing Lindsey. ¶7 Lindsey argues that “[t]he sentencing court placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
exercised its discretion in sentencing Lindsey. ¶7 Lindsey argues that “[t]he sentencing court placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gerald D. O'Brien
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rock County: RICHARD T. WERNER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15317 - 2017-09-21
-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Rock County: RICHARD T. WERNER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15317 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shawn D. Duley
from a judgment of the circuit court for Washington County: RICHARD T. BECKER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12240 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment of the circuit court for Washington County: RICHARD T. BECKER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12240 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]he fact that child-related crimes were removed from the table as part of the plea agreement did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105319 - 2013-12-09
that “[t]he fact that child-related crimes were removed from the table as part of the plea agreement did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105319 - 2013-12-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then noted: “[t]o the extent that we have not listed an issue discussed in either the no-merit reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858738 - 2024-10-08
then noted: “[t]o the extent that we have not listed an issue discussed in either the no-merit reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858738 - 2024-10-08