Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19161 - 19170 of 83454 for case code.
Search results 19161 - 19170 of 83454 for case code.
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21
State v. Leporld L. Miller
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
Melissa Garcia v. Duaine C. Stillman
to place the “witnesses” under oath. The procedural history of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10686 - 2005-03-31
to place the “witnesses” under oath. The procedural history of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10686 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13367 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13367 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on this case and a companion revocation case. ¶3 At the reconfinement hearing, the State argued that Egner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47800 - 2014-09-15
on this case and a companion revocation case. ¶3 At the reconfinement hearing, the State argued that Egner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47800 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James R. Koby v. La Crosse County Circuit Court
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4966 - 2017-09-19
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4966 - 2017-09-19
James R. Koby v. La Crosse County Circuit Court
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4966 - 2005-03-31
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4966 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
operated his vehicle normally. The court denied Fuller’s motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30593 - 2014-09-15
operated his vehicle normally. The court denied Fuller’s motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30593 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13366 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13366 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Melissa Garcia v. Duaine C. Stillman
the “witnesses” under oath. The procedural history of this case is undisputed. Pro se, the Garcias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10686 - 2017-09-20
the “witnesses” under oath. The procedural history of this case is undisputed. Pro se, the Garcias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10686 - 2017-09-20