Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19161 - 19170 of 98453 for court records search online.
Search results 19161 - 19170 of 98453 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
the percentage guidelines as to child support, we remanded so the trial court could make a record of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32970 - 2008-06-09
the percentage guidelines as to child support, we remanded so the trial court could make a record of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32970 - 2008-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
intent to impose a punitive sentence, this is not supported by the record. The trial court’s focus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88779 - 2012-10-30
intent to impose a punitive sentence, this is not supported by the record. The trial court’s focus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88779 - 2012-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
finding was based on credible evidence in the record, we will not disturb it. Circuit Court Finding #2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95625 - 2013-04-17
finding was based on credible evidence in the record, we will not disturb it. Circuit Court Finding #2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95625 - 2013-04-17
COURT OF APPEALS
to meet their needs. I observe that the record before this court does not contain a discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92610 - 2013-02-06
to meet their needs. I observe that the record before this court does not contain a discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92610 - 2013-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
. Dillenburg represents that the circuit court orally denied Ahlers’ motion. The record does not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66677 - 2009-10-27
. Dillenburg represents that the circuit court orally denied Ahlers’ motion. The record does not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66677 - 2009-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 20, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31856 - 2008-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 20, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31856 - 2008-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that to him even as the court advised him that it could impose the full sentence. The record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33066 - 2008-06-17
that to him even as the court advised him that it could impose the full sentence. The record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33066 - 2008-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 14, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54389 - 2010-09-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 14, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54389 - 2010-09-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the sidebar, the trial court confirmed that trial counsel had listened to the complete recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81719 - 2012-05-17
the sidebar, the trial court confirmed that trial counsel had listened to the complete recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81719 - 2012-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
that was complete and accurate. As to the second issue, we agree with the postjudgment court that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39907 - 2009-08-25
that was complete and accurate. As to the second issue, we agree with the postjudgment court that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39907 - 2009-08-25