Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19161 - 19170 of 30177 for de.
Search results 19161 - 19170 of 30177 for de.
State v. One 1997 Ford F-150
of law to which we apply a de novo standard of review. State v. Kirch, 222 Wis. 2d 598, 602, 587 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5744 - 2005-03-31
of law to which we apply a de novo standard of review. State v. Kirch, 222 Wis. 2d 598, 602, 587 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5744 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
. Ziebert, 197 Wis. 2d 144, 152, 539 N.W.2d 883 (1995). ¶16 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106062 - 2013-12-26
. Ziebert, 197 Wis. 2d 144, 152, 539 N.W.2d 883 (1995). ¶16 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106062 - 2013-12-26
Eugene Hafner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, 102 Wis. 2d 256, 260, 306 N.W.2d 79 (Ct. App. 1981). Appellants argue that our review should be de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2304 - 2005-03-31
, 102 Wis. 2d 256, 260, 306 N.W.2d 79 (Ct. App. 1981). Appellants argue that our review should be de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2304 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See id. If the motion raises sufficient material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94192 - 2013-03-18
of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See id. If the motion raises sufficient material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94192 - 2013-03-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court’s decision that a refusal is improper is a question of law for de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217373 - 2018-08-09
The circuit court’s decision that a refusal is improper is a question of law for de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217373 - 2018-08-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional standard for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739768 - 2023-12-12
the constitutional standard for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739768 - 2023-12-12
State v. Theodore D. Kraig
entitle him or her to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 310. Even if all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2593 - 2005-03-31
entitle him or her to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 310. Even if all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2593 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36323 - 2009-04-29
erroneously exercised its discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36323 - 2009-04-29
Certification
court dismissed them. The Town filed a de novo appeal in circuit court. In addition to the nuisance
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29433 - 2007-06-26
court dismissed them. The Town filed a de novo appeal in circuit court. In addition to the nuisance
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29433 - 2007-06-26
Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
to undisputed facts. We review this question of law de novo. See State ex rel. Blum v. Bd. of Educ., 209 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13278 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed facts. We review this question of law de novo. See State ex rel. Blum v. Bd. of Educ., 209 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13278 - 2005-03-31