Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19161 - 19170 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 19161 - 19170 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
State v. Eureka Scruggs
motion, which sought sentence modification. She claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
motion, which sought sentence modification. She claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
Jill Winnega v. North Central Health Protection Plan
] Winnega filled the prescription and submitted a claim therefor to NCHPP. NCHPP denied the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13648 - 2005-03-31
] Winnega filled the prescription and submitted a claim therefor to NCHPP. NCHPP denied the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13648 - 2005-03-31
Ozaukee County v. Michael C. Bloecher
of disorderly conduct contrary to Ozaukee County, Wis., Ordinance 8.02.[1] Bloecher makes four claims on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9879 - 2005-03-31
of disorderly conduct contrary to Ozaukee County, Wis., Ordinance 8.02.[1] Bloecher makes four claims on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9879 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
751, 728 N.W.2d 686,[1] we hold that a circuit court order expressly dismissing the claims of Ecker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32424 - 2008-05-27
751, 728 N.W.2d 686,[1] we hold that a circuit court order expressly dismissing the claims of Ecker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32424 - 2008-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
claim is that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call four witnesses to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49839 - 2010-05-10
claim is that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call four witnesses to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49839 - 2010-05-10
COURT OF APPEALS
raised in a previous motion or appeal, we hold that the claims are procedurally barred absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39487 - 2009-08-17
raised in a previous motion or appeal, we hold that the claims are procedurally barred absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39487 - 2009-08-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
4 ¶10 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant bears the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104346 - 2017-09-21
4 ¶10 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant bears the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104346 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the plea colloquy. As relevant to this appeal, 2 Mursal claimed that while the circuit court informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155843 - 2017-09-21
in the plea colloquy. As relevant to this appeal, 2 Mursal claimed that while the circuit court informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155843 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his claim for double his security deposit, costs, and attorney fees, and granting Jeff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
an order denying his claim for double his security deposit, costs, and attorney fees, and granting Jeff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
[PDF]
Michael S. Jakubowski v. NEVAC, Inc.
court. ¶2 The Jakubowskis brought suit against Badger, among others, alleging claims against Badger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3268 - 2017-09-19
court. ¶2 The Jakubowskis brought suit against Badger, among others, alleging claims against Badger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3268 - 2017-09-19