Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19161 - 19170 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 19161 - 19170 of 58277 for speedy trial.
State v. Joseph C. Evans
and prejudicial evidence was admitted during his trial and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12406 - 2005-03-31
and prejudicial evidence was admitted during his trial and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12406 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randy J. Beaty
that the trial court complied with the procedures set forth in § 971.08, Stats., and State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12814 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court complied with the procedures set forth in § 971.08, Stats., and State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12814 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that: (1) he did not receive proper notice of his trial; (2) the circuit court and the court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440122 - 2021-10-13
that: (1) he did not receive proper notice of his trial; (2) the circuit court and the court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440122 - 2021-10-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel provided ineffective assistance and requests a new grounds trial. This court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876587 - 2024-11-20
trial counsel provided ineffective assistance and requests a new grounds trial. This court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876587 - 2024-11-20
State v. Demetrius A. Green
).[1] Green argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in refusing to allow him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5210 - 2005-03-31
).[1] Green argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in refusing to allow him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5210 - 2005-03-31
97-06 ORDERED effective January 1, 2000, SCR 20:3.6(a),(c),(c)(1),(c)3),(c)(7) are amended; 20:3.6(d)and (e) are created, and the Comment to 20:3.6 is amended. FURTHER ORDERED proposed amendment of SCR 20:3.8, is denied.
Court Madison, WI In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR 20:3.6 -- Trial Publicity
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=999 - 2005-03-31
Court Madison, WI In the Matter of the Amendment of Supreme Court Rules: SCR 20:3.6 -- Trial Publicity
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=999 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, judgment and sentence to permit withdrawal of his guilty plea. The trial court denied Urbschat’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94675 - 2014-09-15
, judgment and sentence to permit withdrawal of his guilty plea. The trial court denied Urbschat’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94675 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kristina Magnuson
at the time of the alleged assault. ¶3 Before trial and in her postconviction motion, Magnuson moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17725 - 2017-09-21
at the time of the alleged assault. ¶3 Before trial and in her postconviction motion, Magnuson moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17725 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and that his trial counsel was ineffective. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131229 - 2017-09-21
and that his trial counsel was ineffective. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131229 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial, Schmitt advised the court that Lewis withdrew because she worked only with represented parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98292 - 2014-09-15
trial, Schmitt advised the court that Lewis withdrew because she worked only with represented parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98292 - 2014-09-15