Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19171 - 19180 of 68502 for did.
Search results 19171 - 19180 of 68502 for did.
State v. Mark R. Kuhn
that Kuhn did not violate the compliance provisions of § ATCP 110.07(4), the judgment of conviction must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9692 - 2005-03-31
that Kuhn did not violate the compliance provisions of § ATCP 110.07(4), the judgment of conviction must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
responsibility for what he did to the victim. ¶10 The circuit court stated that “there is definitely a need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033786 - 2025-11-11
responsibility for what he did to the victim. ¶10 The circuit court stated that “there is definitely a need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033786 - 2025-11-11
State v. Eugene Keeler
was inconsequential, the prosecutor did not advise the defense or the court of the conversation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15118 - 2005-03-31
was inconsequential, the prosecutor did not advise the defense or the court of the conversation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15118 - 2005-03-31
State v. James J. Kempinski
his motion to withdraw his pleas. Because the circuit court did not err in denying the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2005-03-31
his motion to withdraw his pleas. Because the circuit court did not err in denying the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2005-03-31
County of Outagamie v. Kenneth C. Luedke
. This court first notes that Luedke did not file a timely reply to the County’s harmless error argument.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31
. This court first notes that Luedke did not file a timely reply to the County’s harmless error argument.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Virginia R. Ray
on appeal: (1) Did the trial court err by prohibiting her from using “defense of property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5723 - 2017-09-19
on appeal: (1) Did the trial court err by prohibiting her from using “defense of property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5723 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jadair Incorporated v. United States Fire Insurance Company
not been completed; that U.S. Fire did not establish a prima facie case for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9371 - 2017-09-19
not been completed; that U.S. Fire did not establish a prima facie case for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9371 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dale G. Latus v. James Johnson
damages calculations he offered “at the eleventh hour” which did not provide Johnson with any idea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12395 - 2017-09-21
damages calculations he offered “at the eleventh hour” which did not provide Johnson with any idea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12395 - 2017-09-21
WI App 43 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP135 Complete Title of ...
court did not decide the merits of Woodard’s motion. Rather, after a discussion in chambers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78914 - 2012-04-24
court did not decide the merits of Woodard’s motion. Rather, after a discussion in chambers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78914 - 2012-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the circuit court did not err. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Herling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131736 - 2014-12-17
conclude that the circuit court did not err. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Herling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131736 - 2014-12-17