Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19171 - 19180 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 19171 - 19180 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
Cendant Mortgage Corporation v. Oscar Wilson, Jr.
contains a statement of facts and a legal argument that rely heavily on the documents included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6027 - 2017-09-19
contains a statement of facts and a legal argument that rely heavily on the documents included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6027 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher Bunten
and statements derived directly and indirectly from the search of his residence on the ground that the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5527 - 2005-03-31
and statements derived directly and indirectly from the search of his residence on the ground that the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5527 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John E. Prochaska
contends that Prochaska’s “For what?” response to Deputy Pierce’s statement that he was going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14217 - 2014-09-15
contends that Prochaska’s “For what?” response to Deputy Pierce’s statement that he was going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14217 - 2014-09-15
State v. Walter L. Williams
. Here, the trial court’s comments at sentencing were inadequate. A statement that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10907 - 2005-03-31
. Here, the trial court’s comments at sentencing were inadequate. A statement that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10907 - 2005-03-31
Van Buren Management, Inc. v. Joseph W. Checota
was that the statement “Lee made no such misrepresentation” be removed. In response to this motion, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9239 - 2005-03-31
was that the statement “Lee made no such misrepresentation” be removed. In response to this motion, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Townsend
of her statement, Townsend’s lawyer said: As I mentioned earlier, Mr. Townsend has been revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2169 - 2017-09-19
of her statement, Townsend’s lawyer said: As I mentioned earlier, Mr. Townsend has been revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2169 - 2017-09-19
State v. Karl Julius James
apparently contradictory statements; and (4) the State failed to turn over alleged exculpatory evidence.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7794 - 2005-03-31
apparently contradictory statements; and (4) the State failed to turn over alleged exculpatory evidence.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7794 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State relies on this statement in Plude: “‘It may well be that newly discovered evidence impeaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161755 - 2017-09-21
the State relies on this statement in Plude: “‘It may well be that newly discovered evidence impeaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161755 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
information concerning his prior record. Specifically, he disputed a statement in the presentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359067 - 2021-04-28
information concerning his prior record. Specifically, he disputed a statement in the presentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359067 - 2021-04-28
[PDF]
State v. Karl Julius James
-2- apparently contradictory statements; and (4) the State failed to turn over alleged exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7891 - 2017-09-19
-2- apparently contradictory statements; and (4) the State failed to turn over alleged exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7891 - 2017-09-19