Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19181 - 19190 of 30177 for de.

[PDF] State v. Ryan E. Baker
interpretation that we review de novo. In re Commitment of Burris, 2004 WI 91, ¶31, 273 Wis. 2d 294, 682 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7346 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
, which we review de novo. Colstad, 260 Wis. 2d 406, ¶8. ¶13 WISCONSIN STAT. § 86.06 provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31015 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP2479 3 sufficiency of the motion de novo. State v. Sulla, 2016 WI 46, ¶23, 369 Wis. 2d 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206458 - 2018-01-03

[PDF] Elmer T. Schey v. Chrysler Corporation
Lemon Law found in § 218.015, STATS., presents a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13973 - 2014-09-15

State v. Lawrence J. Fields
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2383 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Airry Massey
review de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). ¶16 Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3796 - 2017-09-20

Rib Mountain Ski Corporation v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
is a question of law we review de novo. See id. Because the commission has special expertise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14200 - 2005-03-31

State v. Minko Lewis
. Franks, 438 U.S. at 156. We review a court’s denial of a defendant’s motion for a Franks hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4021 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
constitutionally sufficient representation is a question of law that we decide de novo. Smith, 207 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88800 - 2014-09-15

Dona J. Fabyan v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
us with a question of law that we review de novo. See University of Wisconsin v. Dane County, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3276 - 2005-03-31