Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19181 - 19190 of 29827 for des.
Search results 19181 - 19190 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Jermaine V. Dantzler
(Ct. App. 1988). This is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 146 Wis. 2d at 54, 429
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4044 - 2017-09-20
(Ct. App. 1988). This is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 146 Wis. 2d at 54, 429
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4044 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Sonia M. Heinz v. United Services Automobile Association
review is de novo. See Cardinal v. Leader Nat’l Ins. Co., 166 Wis. 2d 375, 382, 480 N.W.2d 1 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15339 - 2017-09-21
review is de novo. See Cardinal v. Leader Nat’l Ins. Co., 166 Wis. 2d 375, 382, 480 N.W.2d 1 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15339 - 2017-09-21
Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
review de novo, while other factors are matters for the exercise of discretion by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14502 - 2005-03-31
review de novo, while other factors are matters for the exercise of discretion by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14502 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 11
). We need not decide the level of deference to apply as even with de novo review, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131960 - 2017-09-21
). We need not decide the level of deference to apply as even with de novo review, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131960 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 346.61 to a set of undisputed facts, it is a question of law we review de novo. City of La Crosse v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81525 - 2014-09-15
. § 346.61 to a set of undisputed facts, it is a question of law we review de novo. City of La Crosse v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81525 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of constitutional fact subject to de novo review. See State v. Colstad, 2003 WI App 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61908 - 2011-03-28
presents a question of constitutional fact subject to de novo review. See State v. Colstad, 2003 WI App 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61908 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
Ricky L. Heath v. Avco Financial Services of Wisconsin, Inc.
. This issue presents a question of law that we review de novo. National Amusement Co. v. Wisconsin Dept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13472 - 2017-09-21
. This issue presents a question of law that we review de novo. National Amusement Co. v. Wisconsin Dept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13472 - 2017-09-21
Dona J. Fabyan v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
us with a question of law that we review de novo. See University of Wisconsin v. Dane County, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3276 - 2005-03-31
us with a question of law that we review de novo. See University of Wisconsin v. Dane County, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3276 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cynthia M.
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19041 - 2005-07-18
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19041 - 2005-07-18
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of a statute to undisputed facts. As such, our standard of review is de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36301 - 2009-04-28
the application of a statute to undisputed facts. As such, our standard of review is de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36301 - 2009-04-28