Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19191 - 19200 of 58936 for SMALL CLAIMS.

Kenneth C. Applegate v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
an order denying his motion for a new trial or additur. His first claim is that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15830 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) & 939.63, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that his trial lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64979 - 2011-05-31

Gale K. Kruger v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
, Kruger cut his finger on November 1, 1994. All claims with respect to that injury were paid, except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13358 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
reconsideration. Ankerson claims that the trial court erred because there were genuine issues of material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27301 - 2006-12-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Schroeder makes three arguments. He claims the circuit court: (1) exhibited bias against him based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665431 - 2023-06-07

Gerald Breen v. David J. Winkel
claim. The circuit court denied Winkel's motion, and we denied Winkel's petition for leave to appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9740 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
both counsel and Dragisich address, is whether there is any arguable merit to a claim that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92620 - 2013-02-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that his trial lawyer gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64979 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
law enforcement. In his response, Loesch challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, claiming
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173732 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and is not a direct consequence of the plea. Id., ΒΆ12. Consequently, there is no arguable merit to a claim for plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225415 - 2018-10-30