Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19191 - 19200 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19191 - 19200 of 29823 for des.
Heritage Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.
of Review. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10546 - 2005-03-31
of Review. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mellissa Jacobson
that Jacobson drove the vehicle. We review de novo whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21486 - 2017-09-21
that Jacobson drove the vehicle. We review de novo whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21486 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John F. Braz
determination of whether counsel was ineffective de novo. See id. ¶9 At the Machner hearing, Schaan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2689 - 2017-09-19
determination of whether counsel was ineffective de novo. See id. ¶9 At the Machner hearing, Schaan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2689 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mellissa Jacobson
that Jacobson drove the vehicle. We review de novo whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21486 - 2006-02-21
that Jacobson drove the vehicle. We review de novo whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21486 - 2006-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116172 - 2017-09-21
DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Carlson’s revocation decision. After reviewing the evidence de novo, DHA concluded that DOC had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
Carlson’s revocation decision. After reviewing the evidence de novo, DHA concluded that DOC had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800811 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional standard for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739768 - 2023-12-12
the constitutional standard for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739768 - 2023-12-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
On our de novo review of the trial court’s legal analysis, and giving its implicit findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59513 - 2014-09-15
On our de novo review of the trial court’s legal analysis, and giving its implicit findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59513 - 2014-09-15
David Paustenbach v. John Vishnevsky
At the outset, we reject Vishnevsky’s suggestion that our standard of review is de novo because the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3145 - 2005-03-31
At the outset, we reject Vishnevsky’s suggestion that our standard of review is de novo because the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3145 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jessie Redmond
which this court reviews de novo. Rhonda R.D. v. Franklin R.D., 191 Wis.2d 680, 703, 530 N.W.2d 34, 43
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7917 - 2005-03-31
which this court reviews de novo. Rhonda R.D. v. Franklin R.D., 191 Wis.2d 680, 703, 530 N.W.2d 34, 43
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7917 - 2005-03-31