Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19191 - 19200 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19191 - 19200 of 29823 for des.
Paul S. Gantner v. Diane Jo Gantner
shown at trial amounted to only $255. Any effect of this disputed fact is de minimis. [4] We deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3809 - 2005-03-31
shown at trial amounted to only $255. Any effect of this disputed fact is de minimis. [4] We deem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3809 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Steven H.
that performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14674 - 2017-09-21
that performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14674 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jamie M. Grosse
double jeopardy rights. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Thierfelder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11116 - 2017-09-19
double jeopardy rights. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Thierfelder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11116 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct and strategy, will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711920 - 2023-10-11
conduct and strategy, will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711920 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Keith M. Carey
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6585 - 2017-09-19
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6585 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Keith M. Carey
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6584 - 2017-09-19
). ¶8 Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6584 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Alan Berndt v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc.
detailed billing records. The Berndts also submitted supporting affidavits of De Vonna Joy, Jeff Scott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7248 - 2017-09-20
detailed billing records. The Berndts also submitted supporting affidavits of De Vonna Joy, Jeff Scott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7248 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudice from counsel’s deficiencies is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. at 634; State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33877 - 2008-09-02
prejudice from counsel’s deficiencies is a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. at 634; State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33877 - 2008-09-02
State v. Barry A. Kundert
, and, if so, whether it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12778 - 2005-03-31
, and, if so, whether it passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12778 - 2005-03-31
Robert Tomaszewski v. David Giera
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31