Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19191 - 19200 of 64190 for records.
Search results 19191 - 19200 of 64190 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Debrow’s “extremely prejudicial” prior conviction although the record establishes that E.F.’s knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546715 - 2022-07-21
of Debrow’s “extremely prejudicial” prior conviction although the record establishes that E.F.’s knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546715 - 2022-07-21
Frontsheet
on the record during the plea hearing. ¶29 The issue before this court is whether a circuit court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36644 - 2009-05-28
on the record during the plea hearing. ¶29 The issue before this court is whether a circuit court's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36644 - 2009-05-28
Johanna L. Manke v. Physicians Insurance Company
” agreement on the record in open court. Under the agreement the defense was to pay at least $100,000, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21325 - 2006-03-22
” agreement on the record in open court. Under the agreement the defense was to pay at least $100,000, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21325 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Lallaman
; Lallaman’s daughter and niece; and Megan’s school’s record custodian, Diane Oteiro. He sought to have Gena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2310 - 2017-09-19
; Lallaman’s daughter and niece; and Megan’s school’s record custodian, Diane Oteiro. He sought to have Gena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2310 - 2017-09-19
State v. Donald J. Lallaman
the testimony of Megan’s therapist, Linda Blohowiak; Lallaman’s daughter and niece; and Megan’s school’s record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2310 - 2005-03-31
the testimony of Megan’s therapist, Linda Blohowiak; Lallaman’s daughter and niece; and Megan’s school’s record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2310 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, the no-merit reports, and Carter’s response, we conclude that Carter could pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863177 - 2024-10-14
review of the record, the no-merit reports, and Carter’s response, we conclude that Carter could pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863177 - 2024-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, the no-merit reports, and Carter’s response, we conclude that Carter could pursue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863177 - 2024-10-14
review of the record, the no-merit reports, and Carter’s response, we conclude that Carter could pursue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863177 - 2024-10-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987090 - 2025-07-22
a response, but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987090 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
lack arguable merit. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305671 - 2020-11-19
lack arguable merit. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305671 - 2020-11-19
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
reference to § 939.623, STATS., (repeat serious sex crimes). This notation is not explained by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11306 - 2017-09-19
reference to § 939.623, STATS., (repeat serious sex crimes). This notation is not explained by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11306 - 2017-09-19