Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1921 - 1930 of 61985 for child support.
Search results 1921 - 1930 of 61985 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Amanda $11,100 per month. This figure was comprised of $6600 for child support and $4500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246180 - 2019-09-04
Amanda $11,100 per month. This figure was comprised of $6600 for child support and $4500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246180 - 2019-09-04
Roger D. H. v. Virginia O.
concerning the best interest of her child and, “absent a finding that [she] is an unfit parent,” the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3368 - 2005-03-31
concerning the best interest of her child and, “absent a finding that [she] is an unfit parent,” the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3368 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Roger D. H. v. Virginia O.
of her child and, “absent a finding that [she] is an unfit parent,” the court could not interfere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3368 - 2017-09-19
of her child and, “absent a finding that [she] is an unfit parent,” the court could not interfere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3368 - 2017-09-19
State v. Julio G.
placing her with the Milwaukee County Bureau of Child Welfare and, on January 23, 1996, Glamaris was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5280 - 2005-03-31
placing her with the Milwaukee County Bureau of Child Welfare and, on January 23, 1996, Glamaris was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Julio G.
signed a voluntary placement agreement placing her with the Milwaukee County Bureau of Child Welfare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5280 - 2017-09-19
signed a voluntary placement agreement placing her with the Milwaukee County Bureau of Child Welfare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5280 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the mandatory minimum was based on an irrational animosity toward viewers of child pornography. In support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328664 - 2021-01-28
that the mandatory minimum was based on an irrational animosity toward viewers of child pornography. In support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328664 - 2021-01-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Julie argues the evidence was insufficient to support the circuit court’s finding that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61418 - 2014-09-15
. Julie argues the evidence was insufficient to support the circuit court’s finding that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61418 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence was insufficient to support the circuit court’s finding that she did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61418 - 2011-03-21
the evidence was insufficient to support the circuit court’s finding that she did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61418 - 2011-03-21
[PDF]
Marvin G. Bartholf v. Rita J. Bartholf
with regard to the welfare of the child and supports the trial court’s finding that a transfer of primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16269 - 2017-09-21
with regard to the welfare of the child and supports the trial court’s finding that a transfer of primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16269 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lacrosse County v. Mark P.
to terminate was made after a trial court found that grounds existed for termination based upon child abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10164 - 2017-09-19
to terminate was made after a trial court found that grounds existed for termination based upon child abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10164 - 2017-09-19