Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1921 - 1930 of 6410 for wide.
Search results 1921 - 1930 of 6410 for wide.
COURT OF APPEALS
within the wide discretion of the trial court. State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App 181, ¶9, 276 Wis. 2d 224
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92443 - 2013-02-05
within the wide discretion of the trial court. State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App 181, ¶9, 276 Wis. 2d 224
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92443 - 2013-02-05
State v. Andre M. Pirtle
conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Strickland v. Washington, 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9496 - 2005-03-31
conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Strickland v. Washington, 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9496 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
outside the wide range of professionally competent representation. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52020 - 2010-07-14
outside the wide range of professionally competent representation. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52020 - 2010-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
activities. The Court observed that a sentencing court “has always been free to consider a wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27474 - 2006-12-18
activities. The Court observed that a sentencing court “has always been free to consider a wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27474 - 2006-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of “the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Id. at 689. To show prejudice, the defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2008-06-16
of “the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Id. at 689. To show prejudice, the defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2008-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
extraordinary circumstances have been established requires the trial court to consider a wide range of factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125512 - 2014-11-04
extraordinary circumstances have been established requires the trial court to consider a wide range of factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125512 - 2014-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. It remains within the sentencing court's “wide discretion” to determine which factors are the most relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878389 - 2024-11-19
. It remains within the sentencing court's “wide discretion” to determine which factors are the most relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878389 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth W. Raush
is on the defendant to mitigate the weight of those factors.” The State’s argument is wide of the mark because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10787 - 2017-09-20
is on the defendant to mitigate the weight of those factors.” The State’s argument is wide of the mark because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10787 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Donald R. Davis
that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice, Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4455 - 2017-09-19
that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice, Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4455 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the conduct and determine whether, in light of all the circumstances, the omissions fell outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143144 - 2017-09-21
of the conduct and determine whether, in light of all the circumstances, the omissions fell outside the wide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143144 - 2017-09-21