Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19201 - 19210 of 29823 for des.
Search results 19201 - 19210 of 29823 for des.
Dona J. Fabyan v. Waukesha County Board of Adjustment
us with a question of law that we review de novo. See University of Wisconsin v. Dane County, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3276 - 2005-03-31
us with a question of law that we review de novo. See University of Wisconsin v. Dane County, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3276 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for protective placement is a question of law that we review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d 23. ¶7 Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556912 - 2022-08-22
for protective placement is a question of law that we review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d 23. ¶7 Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556912 - 2022-08-22
State v. Cynthia M.
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19041 - 2005-07-18
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19041 - 2005-07-18
State v. Wisconsin Central Transportation Corporation
of a trial court's grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8486 - 2005-03-31
of a trial court's grant or denial of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8486 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of a statute to undisputed facts. As such, our standard of review is de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36301 - 2009-04-28
the application of a statute to undisputed facts. As such, our standard of review is de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36301 - 2009-04-28
State v. Earl Steele III
appeals. ANALYSIS ¶4 We review de novo a circuit court’s conclusion that a guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2174 - 2005-03-31
appeals. ANALYSIS ¶4 We review de novo a circuit court’s conclusion that a guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2174 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145914 - 2017-09-21
prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145914 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment.”).1 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30296 - 2014-09-15
to and not excluded by the court, the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment.”).1 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30296 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David Kosmo v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
associated with removing it. Kosmo appeals the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11352 - 2017-09-19
associated with removing it. Kosmo appeals the summary judgment. We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11352 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Darryl A. Harding
of the vehicle in which Harding was a passenger presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4008 - 2017-09-20
of the vehicle in which Harding was a passenger presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4008 - 2017-09-20