Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19201 - 19210 of 34575 for in n.

COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 180, 186 n.4, 577 N.W.2d 794 (1998), or that the State nonetheless failed to prove that Mims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74632 - 2011-12-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39-46 & n.11, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. The sentence was within the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030890 - 2025-10-30

State v. Juan Jesus S.
definitions but on the facts of a given defendant’s criminal activity. Id. at 403 n.7, 576 N.W.2d at 918
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14480 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gerald Seay
to add,” and Seay responded “[n]o, sir.” Under these circumstances, Seay’s plea of no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13899 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Section 3(d)1 of the Shoreland Ordinance provides in relevant part: [N]o accessory building shall remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232956 - 2019-01-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
written findings of fact and conclusions of law that “[n]o basis exists in this record for this Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244858 - 2019-08-05

COURT OF APPEALS
. Hepperla, 2001 WI App 50, ¶¶6-8 & ¶10 n.7, 241 Wis. 2d 545, 625 N.W.2d 609. This restriction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80439 - 2012-04-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Kyles, 2004 WI 15, ¶7, 269 Wis. 2d 1, 675 N.W.2d 449. “[A]n officer must have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81800 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Lue Her
by the defendant’s repeated dissatisfaction with his successive attorneys. Cummings, 199 Wis. 2d at 753 n.15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7521 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
as a vehicle to fraudulently transfer other assets. See Schwittay v. Sheboygan Falls Mut. Ins. Co., 2001 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93274 - 2014-09-15