Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19211 - 19220 of 59208 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and reconsideration. Owens also claims for the first time on appeal that his appellate counsel abandoned him. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145061 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Sean W. Ottman
his motion to withdraw his plea based upon claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7365 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
various circuit court errors.[4] However, Michael did not include in his reconsideration motion his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88878 - 2012-11-06

State v. Antwan Battles
to §§ 943.32(1)(a) & (2), 940.03, 939.05 and 939.32, Stats. He claims that: (1) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10871 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 11, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Ap...
, and an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. See State v. Hard, No. 2004AP1193-CRNM, unpublished slip op. at 2-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39274 - 2009-08-10

Timothy J. Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.
of its insurance contract. Kopke then filed a claim against RAS directly. RAS denied that its policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3230 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Noel McChristian v. Transportation Insurance Company
excavating firm. McChristian claims the trial court erred: (1) in No. 96-3662 2 concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11880 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Fethiye F. Uygur v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.
. Fethiye F. Uygur appeals from a judgment dismissing her claims that Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16170 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the judge was bound by the plea agreement. ¶7 In denying relief on this claim, the court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76597 - 2014-09-15

State v. Daniel M. Bucheger
and contradictory evidence. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment. On August 6, 1996, at approximately 6:00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13717 - 2005-03-31