Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19221 - 19230 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 19221 - 19230 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Derek D. B.
or informant is tested by establishing: (1) the underlying circumstances that show reason to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9351 - 2005-03-31
or informant is tested by establishing: (1) the underlying circumstances that show reason to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9351 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that the foil packet tested positive for heroin. A police officer testified that Lecher told him it was normal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108349 - 2014-02-25
that the foil packet tested positive for heroin. A police officer testified that Lecher told him it was normal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108349 - 2014-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-prong test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). See State v. Balliette, 2011
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
-prong test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). See State v. Balliette, 2011
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors.” Id. A four-part test has
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1229 - 2005-03-02
to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors.” Id. A four-part test has
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1229 - 2005-03-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. App. 1984)). ¶9 The first prong of the vagueness test is whether the statute sufficiently warns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99893 - 2013-07-24
. App. 1984)). ¶9 The first prong of the vagueness test is whether the statute sufficiently warns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99893 - 2013-07-24
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Phillips
to be suspicious to me.” The officer stopped the car, smelled intoxicants, tested the driver who, it turned out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4727 - 2017-09-19
to be suspicious to me.” The officer stopped the car, smelled intoxicants, tested the driver who, it turned out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4727 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be (and has been) tested,” (2) “whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168400 - 2017-09-21
be (and has been) tested,” (2) “whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168400 - 2017-09-21
Marion Steinberg v. Thomas R. Jensen
the jury they must agree on a “specific” cause contradicts Wisconsin's “a substantial factor test.”[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7684 - 2005-03-31
the jury they must agree on a “specific” cause contradicts Wisconsin's “a substantial factor test.”[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7684 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Subsequent testing of the material seized during the search confirmed a match between Dowell’s DNA profile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50002 - 2010-05-17
. Subsequent testing of the material seized during the search confirmed a match between Dowell’s DNA profile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50002 - 2010-05-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Petersdorff if he would submit to a “computer voice stress analyzer” test. Petersdorff agreed. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80608 - 2014-09-15
Petersdorff if he would submit to a “computer voice stress analyzer” test. Petersdorff agreed. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80608 - 2014-09-15