Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19221 - 19230 of 58500 for speedy trial.

State v. Melvin L. Stick
an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11949 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
] postconviction motion without a hearing. Buss argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29358 - 2007-06-12

COURT OF APPEALS
portion of the judgment granting him and Melissa Ransom a divorce. He contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85990 - 2012-08-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that: (1) he did not receive proper notice of his trial; (2) the circuit court and the court of appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440122 - 2021-10-13

State v. Randy J. Beaty
that the trial court complied with the procedures set forth in § 971.08, Stats., and State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12814 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David Burba
incarceration program. DISCUSSION ¶6 When exercising sentencing discretion, the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5281 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Karl A. Anderson v. Carl G. Hedlund
to finish the soil testing, and if necessary, the soil clean up in the spring." The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14287 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
endangering safety as a repeater. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77320 - 2012-01-30

COURT OF APPEALS
. Ivan Johnson appeals pro se from a circuit court order denying his motion for a new trial without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35558 - 2009-02-17

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
review constituted a denial of Mitchell’s due process rights. We conclude that the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27306 - 2006-12-04