Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 19231 - 19240 of 30177 for de.

[PDF] Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Renee J. M.
order relating to Ashley. We review the former question de novo, and the latter for clear error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3455 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Everton Taylor
of the evidence,” State v. Mitchell, 167 Wis. 2d 672, 682, 482 N.W.2d 364 (1992), and we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3438 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Ricky D. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc
of law, which we review de novo. Greene, 188 Wis. 2d at 370. WISCONSIN STAT. § 125.035(2) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2629 - 2017-09-19

[PDF]
is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d 43, 717 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255672 - 2020-03-05

[PDF] State v. William H. Roberts
convictions. Both issues present questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Liebnitz, 231 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4090 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Waukesha County v. Steven H.
that performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness is a question of law we review de novo, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14674 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Axel Albert Johnson v. Holland America Line-Westours, Inc.
, 166 (Ct. App. 1987). Our review is de novo. We have detailed this procedure in numerous cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11124 - 2017-09-19

2007 WI App 12
. This appeal follows. II. Analysis. ¶4 We review an order granting summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27312 - 2007-01-30

COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84016 - 2012-06-25

State v. Edward Parker
of double jeopardy and due process violations de novo. State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis.2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11074 - 2005-03-31